IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 7.5
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 7.5 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 7.5
7.5
Overall Score
05 Aug 24, 16:08
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker
Overall Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the question with a clear argument and well-developed ideas. It demonstrates strong grammar and vocabulary usage, though the coherence and cohesion could be slightly improved for a smoother flow.
| Overall score | 7.5 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 9.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 5.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 8.0 | |
| Task response | 7.0 |
| Total Errors | 14 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 0 | |
| Lexical resource | 8 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 3 | |
| Task response | 3 |
Question
Some international proposals suggest that all countries, regardless of their economic status, should commit to the same percentage reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
Do you agree or disagree that all countries should have equal targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
#Climate Change
#Agree / Disagree
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:350
Paragraphs:5
Task Response
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
The issue of greenhouse gas
emissions
has become a central topic in global environmental discussions. Some international proposals advocate for all countries
to adhere to the same percentage reduction
targets
for these emissions
, regardless of their economic
conditions. While this approach
might appear equitable on the surface, I argue that it may not be the most effective strategy for addressing climate change.Proponents of uniform
emission
reduction
targets
argue that they ensure all nations
contribute equally to combating global warming. Such an approach
could simplify international agreements and promote a sense of collective responsibility. For instance, if every country
committed to reducing emissions
by 30%, it might foster greater cooperation and shared efforts in mitigating climate change. This could also prevent wealthier nations
from imposing targets
that disproportionately affect poorer countries
, thereby promoting fairness.However, enforcing identical
targets
across nations
does not account for the disparities in economic
development and capacity to implement changes. Developed countries
typically have more resources, technology, and infrastructure to achieve significant reductions
in emissions
. In contrast, developing nations
may struggle with the financial and technological constraints that hinder their ability to meet the same targets
. For example, a country
like Sweden can invest heavily in renewable energy and advanced technologies, while a nation
like Bangladesh might face severe challenges in transitioning away from fossil fuels due to economic
limitations.Moreover, a one-size-fits-all
approach
could potentially undermine the effectiveness of emission
reduction
efforts. Countries
with varying levels of industrialization and energy consumption have different starting points and responsibilities. Tailoring targets
based on national circumstances would allow for more realistic and achievable goals, thereby ensuring that each country
contributes to climate action in a manner that is both equitable and practical.In conclusion, while uniform
emission
reduction
targets
might promote a sense of global solidarity, they do not consider the diverse economic
realities of different countries
. A more flexible approach
, which sets differentiated targets
based on a country
’s economic
status and capabilities, would likely be more effective in achieving meaningful reductions
in greenhouse gas emissions
while accommodating the unique circumstances of each nation
.