IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 7.5
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 7.5 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 7.5
7.5
Overall Score
09 Jul 24, 05:49
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker
Overall Feedback
The essay is well-structured and addresses the question effectively, providing clear arguments and relevant examples. Minor improvements in coherence and idea development could enhance the overall quality.
| Overall score | 7.5 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 9.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 6.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 8.0 | |
| Task response | 7.0 |
| Total Errors | 13 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 0 | |
| Lexical resource | 7 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 3 | |
| Task response | 3 |
Question
Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)?
Why? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
#Government Spending
#Direct Question
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:318
Paragraphs:5
Task Response
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
The debate on whether governments should allocate more funds to improving roads and highways or
public
transportation
systems
is critical. While both are essential, I believe that investing in public
transportation
yields greater benefits in terms of sustainability, economic
efficiency, and social equity.Firstly, enhancing
public
transportation
significantly contributes to environmental sustainability. Buses, trains, and subways can transport many people simultaneously, reducing the number of private vehicles on the road. This decrease in car usage leads to lower emissions of greenhouse gases and pollutants, crucial in combating climate change and improving air quality. For instance, cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have successfully implemented extensive public
transport
networks, resulting in noticeable reductions in air pollution and carbon footprints.Secondly,
public
transportation
is more economically efficient in the long run. While the initial costs of constructing and maintaining public
transit systems
may be high, the benefits outweigh these expenses. Improved public
transport
reduces traffic congestion, which is a significant economic
drain due to lost productivity and increased fuel consumption. For example, a study in New York City estimated that traffic congestion costs the economy billions of dollars annually. Investing in a robust public
transport
system
can mitigate these losses and enhance overall economic
productivity.Moreover,
public
transportation
promotes social equity by providing affordable and accessible travel options for all citizens, including those who cannot afford private vehicles. This inclusivity ensures that low-income individuals, the elderly, and people with disabilities can participate fully in society, access employment opportunities, and receive essential services. In cities like Singapore, the government’s focus on developing an extensive and affordable public
transport
system
has led to high ridership
rates and improved quality of life for its residents.In conclusion, while both roads and
public
transport
are important, I advocate for greater investment in public
transportation
. This approach offers superior environmental benefits, economic
efficiency, and social inclusivity, leading to more sustainable and equitable urban development.