IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 5.5
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 5.5 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 5.5
5.5
Overall Score
18 Jun 24, 20:13
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker
Overall Feedback
The essay addresses the question and provides a balanced discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of high government spending on disaster relief. However, there are several grammatical errors and issues with coherence and cohesion that affect readability and clarity.
| Overall score | 5.5 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 5.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 5.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 6.0 | |
| Task response | 6.0 |
| Total Errors | 37 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 5 | |
| Lexical resource | 26 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 3 | |
| Task response | 3 |
Question
High government spending on disaster relief is crucial for effective response and recovery. Yet, it may lead to decreased funding for other essential services and potential waste or mismanagement of resources.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of high government spending on disaster relief.
#Government Spending
#Discussion
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:337
Paragraphs:4
Task Response
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Grammar Usage
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
In recent times, government
authorities
around the world
are increasing their budgets for disaster
management
, as world
is witnessing increased volume of natural calmities
like earthquakes and landslides. This action is necessary to maintain high
standards of effective response
and recovery
, however,
this would lead to decreased funding for other
services
such as waste management
, or even mismanagement of national funds. In my opinion, higher
governemental
budget allocation
towards relief fund is important, and the advantages of this measure outweight
the disadvanatges
.On the one side, excessive money diverted towards
response
and recovery
taskforces would lead to deductions of the resources
for other
essential services
. For instance, in a country
like Sweden, where possibility of earthquakes and landslides is low, the allocation
of resource
towards relief taskforce would deprieve
other
facilities from funding. As a result, essential services
would come under immense pressure due to the lack of required assets and investment
. Therefore, instead of blind investment
in catastrophe operations, authorities
should priortize
the need of the nation and plan the financial blueprint accordingly.On the
otherside
, a country
should always be prepared to handle any natural disaster
that might create havoc, thus,
adequate resources
are needed
for quick response
teams. For instance, countries
like Japan and South Korea have high
probability to be hit by tsunami, so national authorities
always need
to be ready to safequard
and recover their citizen those who might get stuck in dangerous and unsafe surroundings. Therefore, it would be wise and smart for these nations to be prepared for any disaster
that might put the safety and lives of their citizens in danger
rather than having inadequate resource
and assets to handle the catastrophe.In conclusion, unplanned and extensive
investment
in disaster
management
might put the basic services
under pressure because of lack of appropiate
capital needed
for quick response
and recovery
. However, for countries
that are located in the accident prone
areas, it is wise to be prepared by maintain world
class
response
team through extensive budgeting and money allocations
.