IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 7.5
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 7.5 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 7.5
7.5
Overall Score
09 Sept 24, 11:08
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker
Overall Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the question with a clear stance and well-developed arguments. It demonstrates strong grammatical accuracy and a good range of vocabulary, though some ideas could be more deeply explored for a higher score.
| Overall score | 7.5 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 9.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 6.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 7.0 | |
| Task response | 7.0 |
| Total Errors | 15 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 0 | |
| Lexical resource | 8 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 4 | |
| Task response | 3 |
Question
In the last few decades there have been more and more cases of famous people being hounded by the press. Some people think that famous people in the media have no right to privacy.
To what extent do you agree?
#Media & Advertising
#Agree / Disagree
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:301
Paragraphs:5
Task Response
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
Missing Linking Devices
right
to privacy
, or does their public
status forfeit such rights
?On one hand, there are compelling arguments for the protection of
privacy
. Famous individuals, despite their public
profiles, are still human and deserve to live without constant intrusion. The media
's relentless pursuit can lead to significant emotional and psychological distress. For example, high-profile figures such as Princess Diana and actors like Meghan Markle have faced severe mental health impacts due to invasive press coverage. These instances highlight the potential for media
intrusion to cross ethical boundaries and infringe on personal well-being.Conversely, some argue that by choosing a life in the
public
eye, stars implicitly accept a certain level of scrutiny. Fame often brings with it a heightened level of public
interest, which can be seen as
a trade-off for the benefits of being in the spotlight. Icons enjoy substantial financial gains and social influence, which might justify some degree of media attention. In this view, privacy
might be seen as
a negotiable commodity in exchange for the perks of notoriety.However, a balanced approach is necessary. While
public
interest is inherent to fame, it is crucial to establish ethical guidelines that respect personal boundaries. For instance, regulations could limit the extent of invasive practices, ensuring that media
coverage does not inflict undue harm. This would protect notables' rights
while still allowing the media
to fulfill
its role of informing the public.In conclusion, while the allure of fame inevitably invites
public
scrutiny, it should not come at the cost of basic privacy
rights
. By implementing respectful guidelines, it is possible to balance the interests of both luminaries and the media
.