IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 7.5

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 7.5 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 7.5

7.5
Overall Score
09 Sept 24, 11:08
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker

Overall Feedback

The essay effectively addresses the question with a clear stance and well-developed arguments. It demonstrates strong grammatical accuracy and a good range of vocabulary, though some ideas could be more deeply explored for a higher score.
Overall score7.5
Grammatical range and accuracy9.0
Lexical resource6.0
Coherence & cohesion7.0
Task response7.0
Total Errors15
Grammatical range and accuracy0
Lexical resource8
Coherence & cohesion4
Task response3
Question
In the last few decades there have been more and more cases of famous people being hounded by the press. Some people think that famous people in the media have no right to privacy.
To what extent do you agree?
#Media & Advertising
#Agree / Disagree
Submitted Answer
English:UK English
Words:301
Paragraphs:5
Task Response
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
Missing Linking Devices
In recent decades, the press has increasingly targeted famous individuals, often encroaching upon their personal lives. This raises a contentious issue: should celebrities have a
right
to
privacy
, or does their
public
status forfeit such
rights
?
On one hand, there are compelling arguments for the protection of
privacy
. Famous individuals, despite their
public
profiles, are still human and deserve to live without constant intrusion. The
media
's relentless pursuit can lead to significant emotional and psychological distress. For example, high-profile figures such as Princess Diana and actors like Meghan Markle have faced severe mental health impacts due to invasive press coverage. These instances highlight the potential for
media
intrusion to cross ethical boundaries and infringe on personal well-being.
Conversely, some argue that by choosing a life in the
public
eye, stars implicitly accept a certain level of scrutiny. Fame often brings with it a heightened level of
public
interest, which can be
seen as
a trade-off for the benefits of being in the spotlight. Icons enjoy substantial financial gains and social influence, which might justify some degree of media attention. In this view,
privacy
might be
seen as
a negotiable commodity in exchange for the perks of notoriety.
However, a balanced approach is necessary. While
public
interest is inherent to fame, it is crucial to establish ethical guidelines that respect personal boundaries. For instance, regulations could limit the extent of invasive practices, ensuring that
media
coverage does not inflict undue harm. This would protect notables'
rights
while still allowing the
media
to
fulfill
its role of informing the public.
In conclusion, while the allure of fame inevitably invites
public
scrutiny, it should not come at the cost of basic
privacy
rights
. By implementing respectful guidelines, it is possible to balance the interests of both luminaries and the
media
.

Boost Your English Exam Score.
Start Practicing Today.