IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 6
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 6 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 6
6.0
Overall Score
03 Nov 24, 13:28
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker
Overall Feedback
The essay addresses the task but lacks a clear thesis statement and has some grammatical inaccuracies. Coherence and cohesion are maintained, but the logical flow and vocabulary usage could be improved for a higher score.
| Overall score | 6.0 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 6.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 6.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 6.0 | |
| Task response | 6.0 |
| Total Errors | 18 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 3 | |
| Lexical resource | 8 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 3 | |
| Task response | 4 |
Question
Some argue that extensive reliance on public transport can reduce traffic and pollution, while others believe it restricts personal freedom and convenience that comes with owning a car.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that societies should encourage reliance on public transport despite the potential loss of personal freedom?
#Public Transport
#Agree / Disagree
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:315
Paragraphs:5
Task Response
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Grammar Range
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
Thesis Statement
public
transport
can reduce
traffic
and also over people has become highly controversial,while and
other people agree that freedom or convenience comes with owning car
.One of the primary benefits of extensive
public
transportation use is its potential to reduce
both traffic
congestion and environmental pollution. In cities with well-developed public
transport
systems, fewer cars
on the road result in smoother traffic
flow, leading to shorter travel times and less frustration for commuters. Additionally, public
transport
systems, particularly those powered by electricity or clean energy, produce lower emissions compared to private vehicles, helping to improve air quality and combat climate change.Another significant advantage is the economic benefit for individuals.
Public
transport
is often more affordable than maintaining a personal vehicle, which requires fuel, maintenance, insurance, and parking fees. By relying on public
transportation, people can save money that can be allocated to other areas, potentially improving their quality of life. Furthermore, reducing
the number of cars
on the road can reduce
infrastructure costs for governments, as there would be less wear and tear on roads and highways.Moreover, personal freedom can be compromised by extensive reliance on
public
transport
. Car
owners have the freedom to travel directly from point A to point B without having to make multiple stops or wait for connections. This sense of autonomy is particularly valuable for families or individuals with specific needs, such as transporting large items or traveling
with pets, where private cars
offer clear advantages in terms of convenience and comfort.In conclusion, although
public
transport
has certain limitations regarding flexibility and convenience, the broader benefits for society—such as reducing
pollution, traffic
congestion, and individual expenses—make it a preferable option. Balancing the use of both private vehicles and public
transport
can help address these challenges, but promoting public
transportation remains essential for creating sustainable, livable
urban environments.