IELTS Essay Checker - Sample Band 7
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Band 7 | IELTS Essay Sample Band 7
7.0
Overall Score
14 Nov 24, 14:20
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Essay Checker
Overall Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the task, providing a balanced discussion of both funding sources with a clear conclusion. It demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, though further development of ideas and examples could enhance coherence and task achievement.
| Overall score | 7.0 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 9.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 5.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 6.0 | |
| Task response | 7.0 |
| Total Errors | 18 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 0 | |
| Lexical resource | 8 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 7 | |
| Task response | 3 |
Question
Funding for public transport can come from various sources, prominently including government budgets and private sector investments. While government funding is considered more stable, private investment can introduce innovative technologies and efficiencies.
Discuss both these points of view and explain which one you support more.
#Public Transport
#Discussion
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:343
Paragraphs:6
Task Response
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Ideas Development
Logical Flow
Funding
for public
transport
is crucial to ensuring
that cities and countries can meet the growing transportation needs of their populations. While government
funding
is often considered a more stable and long-term solution, private
sector
investments can play a significant role in driving innovation and improving efficiency. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of both funding
sources and discuss the best approach to public
transport
financing.Missing Linking Devices
Government Funding
One of the key benefits of
government
funding
for public
transport
is its stability and long-term sustainability. Governments
can allocate a portion of their annual budgets to maintain and expand transportation networks, ensuring
that public
transport
services are available to all citizens, regardless of their income level. Public
funds are also essential for infrastructure development, such as
building new subway lines, upgrading bus fleets, or modernizing train stations. For example, many large cities, such as
London and Tokyo, rely heavily on government
support to maintain their extensive and highly efficient transport
systems. Moreover, since governments
are not driven by profit, their focus can be on accessibility and social equality, ensuring
that public
transport
serves the broader public
good rather than just a commercial interestOne significant advantage of
private
sector
involvement is the infusion of capital that can help reduce the financial burden on governments
. In some cases, public
-private
partnerships (PPPs) have proven successful in financing major infrastructure projects, such as
the construction of new subway lines or high-speed rail networks. The partnership between the government
and private
companies can ensure
that public
transport
systems are modern, efficient, and financially viable.Missing Linking Devices
Conclusion
In conclusion, both
government
funding
and private
sector
investment have distinct advantages and limitations when it comes to financing public
transport
. While government
funding
ensures
stability and broad accessibility, private
sector
involvement can introduce innovation and improve efficiency. A balanced approach, where governments
provide stable funding
and private
companies contribute to innovation, is likely the most effective way to ensure
that public
transport
systems are sustainable, efficient, and capable of meeting the needs of a growing population.