IELTS Writing Academic Checker - Sample Band 6
IELTS Writing Task 1 Sample Band 6 | IELTS Writing Academic Report Sample Band 6 (Academic Training)
6.0
Overall Score
25 Sept 24, 14:48
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Writing Academic Checker
Overall Feedback
The answer provides a general comparison of water usage in California and New York but contains several grammatical errors and lacks clarity in some parts. The data is mostly accurate, but the explanation could be more detailed and better organized.
| Overall score | 6.0 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 6.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 6.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 6.0 | |
| Task response | 5.0 |
| Total Errors | 9 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 2 | |
| Lexical resource | 2 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 3 | |
| Task response | 2 |
Question
New York
California
Compare the water usage in different sectors in California and New York in 2022.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
Make comparisons where relevant.
Highlight any significant differences or similarities.
#Water Usage
#Pie Chart
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:194
Paragraphs:6
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Grammar Range
Logical Flow
Bullet Point Missing or Incomplete
The two pie charts above shows the percentage of water usage in different sectors in two cities (Carlifornia and New York) in 2022. The diagrams are divided into five sectors, namely: Agriculture, Domestic, Industrial, Public Services and Others in both towns.
Overall, Domestic sector stands out to have the highest rate with 40% in New York and second to Agriculture in Carlifornia with 30%. As far as farming is concerned, it shows to have significantly dropped in New York to 20% which is half of what it occupies in the New York. It is clear that the rates combined between these
towns
it is the second highest in using water.With respect to the Industrial departments New York occupies a larger portion, up-to 25% whilst it is positioned third in the New York.
Public services in constantly steady in both states with 10% . There are no changes in projected in both states.
Finally, other sections possess the least figures, filling approximately 5% in both towns.
Overall, the majority of the fields have very slight differences in comparison to one another, which can predict that the people of both states share similar usage rates.