IELTS Writing Academic Checker - Sample Band 7
IELTS Writing Task 1 Sample Band 7 | IELTS Writing Academic Report Sample Band 7 (Academic Training)
7.0
Overall Score
17 Oct 24, 03:07
Want to practice this question?
Go to IELTS Writing Academic Checker
Overall Feedback
The response effectively compares water usage in California and New York, accurately reflecting the data. However, minor grammatical errors and slightly limited vocabulary range affect the overall clarity and precision.
| Overall score | 7.0 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 7.0 | |
| Lexical resource | 7.0 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 7.0 | |
| Task response | 7.0 |
| Total Errors | 8 | |
| Grammatical range and accuracy | 1 | |
| Lexical resource | 3 | |
| Coherence & cohesion | 3 | |
| Task response | 1 |
Question
New York
California
Compare the water usage in different sectors in California and New York in 2022.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
Make comparisons where relevant.
Highlight any significant differences or similarities.
#Water Usage
#Pie Chart
Submitted Answer
English:
Words:195
Paragraphs:5
Readability
Coherence
Cohesion
Vocabulary Usage
Grammar Range
Logical Flow
The pie chart illustrates the usage of water in five sectors —Agriculture, Domestic, Industrial, Public Services and
Other
in California and New York in 2022.Overall, the data clearly shows that Agriculture and Domestic Indusrties were the most popular in water usage in Carlifornia and New York respectively, significantly surpassing
other
options. Industrial and Public Services also represented a substantial portion of water consumption, while other
sectors accounted for a much smaller share.In Carlifornia, Agriculture usage was particularly remarkable, with nearly 40% of water utilization, representing a high allocation level. Following closely behind, is the Domestic field with nearly 30% and 40% in both Carlifornia and New York respectively.
Industrial made up the third-largest division in the region with around 15% in Carlifornia and 25% in New York, just 5% and 15% ahead of Public Services, which ranked fourth in both cities.
Other
sectors recorded a relatively lower rate, about 5% in both states, indicating a consistent trend in both locations.In conclusion,
wate
allocation varied significantly between the two cities, with some sectors like Public Services and Other
services showing markedly lower usage. However, predicting future trends in water usage remains uncertain.